Current:Home > FinanceCalifornia court says Uber, Lyft can treat state drivers as independent contractors -ThriveEdge Finance
California court says Uber, Lyft can treat state drivers as independent contractors
View
Date:2025-04-16 18:17:00
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — App-based ride hailing and delivery companies like Uber and Lyft can continue to treat their California drivers as independent contractors, a state appeals court ruled Monday, allowing the tech giants to bypass other state laws requiring worker protections and benefits.
The ruling mostly upholds a voter-approved law, called Proposition 22, that said drivers for companies like Uber and Lyft are independent contractors and are not entitled to benefits like paid sick leave and unemployment insurance. A lower court ruling in 2021 had said Proposition 22 was illegal, but Monday's ruling reversed that decision.
"Today's ruling is a victory for app-based workers and the millions of Californians who voted for Prop 22," said Tony West, Uber's chief legal officer. "We're pleased that the court respected the will of the people."
The ruling is a defeat for labor unions and their allies in the state Legislature who passed a law in 2019 requiring companies like Uber and Lyft to treat their drivers as employees.
"Today the Appeals Court chose to stand with powerful corporations over working people, allowing companies to buy their way out of our state's labor laws and undermine our state constitution," said Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, leader of the California Labor Federation and a former state assemblywoman who authored the 2019 law. "Our system is broken. It would be an understatement to say we are disappointed by this decision."
The ruling wasn't a complete defeat for labor unions, as the court ruled the companies could not stop their drivers from joining a labor union and collectively bargain for better working conditions, said Mike Robinson, one of the drivers who filed the lawsuit challenging Proposition 22.
"Our right to join together and bargain collectively creates a clear path for drivers and delivery workers to hold giant gig corporations accountable," he said. "But make no mistake, we still believe Prop 22 — in its entirety — is an unconstitutional attack on our basic rights."
The California Legislature passed a law in 2019 that changed the rules of who is an employee and who is an independent contractor. It's an important distinction for companies because employees are covered by a broad range of labor laws that guarantee them certain benefits while independent contractors are not.
While the law applied to lots of industries, it had the biggest impact on app-based ride hailing and delivery companies. Their business relies on contracting with people to use their own cars to give people rides and make deliveries. Under the 2019 law, companies would have to treat those drivers as employees and provide certain benefits that would greatly increase the businesses' expenses.
In November 2020, voters agreed to exempt app-based ride hailing and delivery companies from the 2019 law by approving a ballot proposition. The proposition included "alternative benefits" for drivers, including a guaranteed minimum wage and subsidies for health insurance if they average 25 hours of work a week. Companies like Uber, Lyft and DoorDash spent $200 million on a campaign to make sure it would pass.
Three drivers and the Service Employees International Union sued, arguing the ballot proposition was illegal in part because it limited the state Legislature's authority to change the law or pass laws about workers' compensation programs. In 2021, a state judge agreed with them and ruled companies like Uber and Lyft were not exempt.
Monday, a state appeals court reversed that decision, allowing the companies to continue to treat their drivers as independent contractors.
The ruling might not be the final decision. The Service Employees International Union could still appeal the decision to the California Supreme Court, which could decide to hear the case.
"We will consider all those options as we decide how to ensure we continue fighting for these workers," said Tia Orr, executive director of SEIU California.
veryGood! (94)
Related
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Industrial Strength: How the U.S. Government Hid Fracking’s Risks to Drinking Water
- Knoxville has only one Black-owned radio station. The FCC is threatening its license.
- Montana GOP doubles down after blocking trans lawmaker from speaking, citing decorum
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Pandemic hits 'stop button,' but for some life is forever changed
- Pro-DeSantis PAC airs new ad focused on fight with Disney, woke culture
- How Social Media Use Impacts Teen Mental Health
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Diversity in medicine can save lives. Here's why there aren't more doctors of color
Ranking
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Titan submersible maker OceanGate faced safety lawsuit in 2018: Potential danger to passengers
- Taxpayers no longer have to fear the IRS knocking on their doors. IRS is ending practice.
- Some people get sick from VR. Why?
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- How Social Media Use Impacts Teen Mental Health
- Major psychologists' group warns of social media's potential harm to kids
- FAMU clears football activities to resume after unauthorized rap video in locker room
Recommendation
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
Golnesa GG Gharachedaghi Shares Why She Doesn't Hide Using Ozempic for Weight Loss
Lupita Nyong’o Addresses Rumors of Past Romance With Janelle Monáe
The End of New Jersey’s Solar Gold Rush?
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
Fishing crew denied $3.5 million prize after their 619-pound marlin is bitten by a shark
First U.S. Nuclear Power Closures in 15 Years Signal Wider Problems for Industry
Timeline: The Justice Department's prosecution of the Trump documents case