Current:Home > NewsNew labor rule could be a big deal for millions of franchise and contract workers. Here's why. -ThriveEdge Finance
New labor rule could be a big deal for millions of franchise and contract workers. Here's why.
View
Date:2025-04-12 06:07:06
Millions of workers at some of the biggest U.S. employers could gain sweeping new rights under a new federal labor rule set to take effect by year-end.
The final rule, announced Thursday by the National Labor Relations Board, would classify companies such as franchisees and contractors as an employer if they control basic conditions of work such as pay, scheduling and supervision. In a stroke, that would make fast-food giants, retailers, technology players, staffing firms and many other businesses that hire workers on a contract basis more accountable for violations of labor law, one expert told CBS MoneyWatch.
"The new rule is enormously important and could bolster the rights of millions of employees," John Logan, chair of labor and employment studies at San Francisco State University, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The so-called joint employer rule replaces one enacted during the Trump administration that required companies to have "direct and immediate" control over contract and franchise workers to be considered joint employers. Labor advocates contend the present standard gave companies an escape route for violations of labor law.
"Under the previous standard, it was too easy for corporations to claim they weren't responsible for violations of workers' rights and almost impossible to hold accountable," Logan said.
Companies that are classified as joint employers under the new rule could now be made to take part in collective bargaining, for instance.
Industry pushback
NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran said the board took "a legally correct return to common-law principles" in crafting the rule, which takes effect on December 26.
The regulation is opposed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Retail Association (NRA), with both indicating that they could challenge the rule in court.
"It defies common sense to say that businesses can be held liable for workers they don't employ at workplaces they don't own or control, yet that is exactly what the new NLRB joint-employer rule does," Glenn Spencer, the group's senior vice president for the employment division, said in a statement. "This rule will create chaos and more legal confusion that will harm both employers and workers. The U.S. Chamber will carefully evaluate our options going forward, including litigation."
The NRA reiterated its opposition to the new standard, calling it "unclear, unnecessary and harmful to thousands of retail employers and the millions of Americans they employ."
American Hotel & Lodging Association President & CEO Chip Rogers called the LNRB's new rule "devastating to the hotel industry and the millions of people we employ," and accused the agency of trying to dismantle the franchise business model to "artificially increase unionization."
Sens. Joe Manchin, D.-W. Va. and Bill Cassidy, R.-La., say they'll introduce a resolution to overturn the rule, Politico reported.
veryGood! (616)
Related
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Winner of $1.6 billion Mega Millions jackpot claims prize in Florida
- CVS responds quickly after pharmacists frustrated with their workload miss work
- Canadian police won’t investigate doctor for sterilizing Indigenous woman
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- A rocket launcher shell accidentally explodes at a home in southern Pakistan and 8 people are dead
- Scottish officials approve UK’s first drug consumption room intended for safer use of illegal drugs
- Slaves’ descendants seek a referendum to veto zoning changes they say threaten their Georgia island
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Mandela’s granddaughter Zoleka dies at 43. Her life was full of tragedy but she embraced his legacy
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Cher Accused of Hiring 4 Men to Kidnap Her Son Elijah Blue Allman
- Chris Kaba shooting case drives London police to consider army backup as officers hand in gun licenses
- Nick Cannon Says He Probably Wouldn’t Be Alive Without Mariah Carey's Help During Lupus Battle
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Travis Kelce Reacts to Paparazzi Camping Outside His House Amid Taylor Swift Romance Rumors
- See Scumbag Tom Sandoval Willingly Get Annihilated By His Haters and Celebrity Critics
- Let it snow? Winter predictions start as El Niño strengthens. Here's what forecasters say.
Recommendation
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Britain approves new North Sea oil drilling, delighting the industry but angering critics
Houston approves $5M to relocate residents living near polluted Union Pacific rail yard
More than half of Americans say they don't have enough for retirement, poll shows
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
Level up leftovers with Tiffani Thiessen’s surf & turf tacos
IMF says Sri Lanka needs to boost reforms and collect more taxes for its bailout funding package
Aaron Rodgers sends subtle jab to Joe Namath, tells Jets offense to 'grow up a little bit'